Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 28;15(7):e0236698. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236698

Table 1. Mean characteristics of patients who started RRT for end-stage renal disease and mean values of the contextual indicators in townships for the whole area and by quintiles of RRT incidence rate.

RRT incidence ratea quintiles, pmi
Whole area < 126 126–157 158–186 187–224 > 224 P valueb
Number of townships 282 56 56 57 56 57
Patients n (%) 6835 (100) 540 (7.9) 886 (13.0) 1279 (18.7) 2024 (29.6) 2106 (30.8)
Mean patient characteristics
Age at RRT start (years) 68.5±4.3 67.7±6.0 67.9±3.8 68.1±4.4 69.1±3.5 69.5±3.3 0.008
Male sex (%) 63.2±14.5 64.0±21.3 65.7±14.6 65.1±13.9 60.1±10.6 61.1±8.8 0.06
Treatment at RRT start (%)
 • Hemodialysis 79.6±14.0 76.2±19.5 76.6±12.9 81.3±12.3 79.9±11.4 83.5±11.5 0.003
 • Peritoneal dialysis 20.5±13.0 28.0±19.6 21.4±10.6 19.0±10.4 19.0±10.6 15.9±9.9 <10−4
Mean township characteristics
Population health status
 • Prematurec mortality d 103.1±17.7 99.6±16.0 103.0±19.0 107.3±21.2 100.3±15.7 105.0±15.0 0.27
 • Cardiovascular mortality d 109.2±14.2 108.0±13.7 111.0±13.4 111.3±13.6 105.4±14.0 110.1±15.8 0.80
 • Diabetes-related mortality d 124.1±35.3 121.6±36.8 126.3±33.1 126.8±37.3 120.4±34.6 125.5±35.4 0.90
 • Prevalencee of all treated chronic illnesses 95.3±13.3 89.3±9.2 98.3±11.6 93.7±13.5 97.8±15.4 97.4±13.9 0.004
 • Prevalencee of treated diabetes 105.5±17.3 94.5±10.8 107.1±12.6 102.2±15.8 111.1±17.6 112.6±21.3 <10−4
Demographic-socioeconomic context
 • Foreign-born people (%) 2.8±3.5 2.5±2.6 2.6±3.4 2.9±4.3 2.8±3.4 2.9±3.7 0.49
 • People living in a rural area (%) 47.3±32.9 57.1±31.1 59.2±30.0 45.8±30.2 31.9±30.8 42.6±35.6 <10−4
 • Adults without a high school diploma (%) 65.3±6.4 64.9±6.0 66.4±5.1 65.0±6.5 63.4±8.1 66.7±5.7 0.84
 • Blue-collar workersf (%) 28.7±5.9 28.2±5.5 29.4±4.7 28.0±6.2 28.0±7.5 29.6±5.1 0.58
 • Managers and higher-level professionalsf (%) 10.3±4.3 10.2±3.8 9.3±2.7 10.8±4.5 12.1±5.4 9.5±3.8 0.42
 • Unemployment rate (%) 12.1±3.3 10.4±2.4 11.2±2.8 12.7±3.5 12.9±3.4 13.3±3.6 <10−4
 • FDep indexg 0.0±1.5 -0.33±1.4 -0.03±1.3 0.04±1.6 -0.14±1.6 0.46±1.5 0.02
Health services accessibility
 • Local potential accessibility to general practitionerh 64.8±15.3 59.1±11.5 62.3±15.3 64.4±14.3 69.8±14.8 68.5±17.9 <10−4
 • Mean travel time to closest nephrologist (min) 27.4±13.6 29.9±13.7 31.0±13.8 26.8±12.5 23.2±13.7 26.0±13.3 0.006
 • Mean travel time to closest dialysis unit (min) 23.4±11.7 26.2±12.8 25.9±11.7 24.0±12.4 19.6±11.1 21.5±9.3 0.001
Medical practices in dialysis
 • Median eGFR at RRT start (mL/min/1.73m2) 8.8±1.5 8.0±1.2 8.4±1.2 8.7±1.5 9.1±1.3 9.9±1.7 <10−4
 • Incident patients ≥ 85 years old (%) 9.7±2.6 8.3±2.3 9.5±2.4 9.5±2.6 9.9±2.3 11.4±2.6 <10−4
 • Incident patients who died within 3 months (%) 8.2±2.5 7.0±2.3 7.9±2.6 8.1±2.6 9.0±2.5 9.0±2.3 <10−4

Values expressed with ± sign are the mean ± SD. RRT = renal replacement therapy, pmi per million inhabitants, eGFR = estimated glomerular filtration rate.

a age- and sex-standardized (2005 EU 27 population [16]).

b trend test.

c all deaths before age 65.

d comparative mortality figure, standard = 100 French population 2006.

e comparative prevalence figure, standard = 100 whole French population (2006).

f percentage among active population.

g France Deprivation index, according to Rey et al [17].

h according to Barlet et al [18].