Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 28;746:141326. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141326

Table 2.

Comparative details of reported molecular detection of SARS-CoV-2 in the wastewater of various countries.

Country State/city Water type Virus concentration method Positive rate Maximum concentration (copies/L) RT-(q)PCR
target region
Reference
India Ahmedabad Untreated wastewater PEG precipitation of centrifugated supernatant 8 May: 100%
27 May:100%
5.6 × 10
3.5 × 102
ORF1ab gene
S gene
N gene
Present study
Treated wastewater 8 May: 0%
27 May: 0%
Australia Brisbane, Queensland Untreated wastewater Electronegative membrane-direct RNA extraction; ultrafiltration 2/9 (22%) 1.2 × 103 N gene (Ahmed et al., 2020a, Ahmed et al., 2020b)
Centricon (Merck) ultrafiltration of centrifugated supernatant N_Sarbecco: 1/9
NIID_2019-nCOV_N: 0/9
1.9 N gene
The Netherlands Amsterdam, The Hague, Utrecht, Apeldoorn, Amersfoort, Schiphol, Tilburg Untreated wastewater Centricon (Merck) ultrafiltration of centrifugated supernatant 14/24 (58%)
N1: 14/24
N2: 0/24
N3: 8/24
E: 5/24
NA N gene
E gene
(Medema et al., 2020)
USA Massachusetts Untreated wastewater PEG precipitation of filtered sample N1: 4/6
N2: 1/6
N3: 4/6
N1: 104–2 × 105
N2: 3 × 104–105
N3: 104–105
N gene (Wu et al., 2020b)
Bozeman, Montana Untreated wastewater Corning Spin-X ultrafiltration of filtered sample 7/7 (100%)
N1: 7/7
N2: 7/7
N1: 103–105
N2: 103–3 × 105
N gene (Nemudryi et al., 2020)
New Haven, Connecticut Primary sludge Direct RNA extraction 44/44 1.7 × 106–4.6 × 108 N gene (Peccia et al., 2020)
France Paris Untreated wastewater Ultracentrifugation 23/23 (100%) >107.5 E gene (Wurtzer et al., 2020)
Treated wastewater 6/8 (75%) ~106 E gene
Untreated wastewater NA (100%) 104–107 E gene RdRp gene (Wurtzer et al., 2020)
Italy Milan and Rome, Untreated wastewater PEG/dextran precipitation of centrifuged supernatant 100%
12/12
NA (PCR detection) ORF1ab gene
S gene
(La Rosa et al., 2020)
China Wuchang Fangcang Hospital Untreated wastewater PEG precipitation of centrifuged supernatant 0/4 0.05–1.87 × 105 ORF1
N gene
(Zhang et al., 2020)
Treated wastewater 77%
7/9
Israel Various locations Untreated wastewater Primary: PEG or Alum precipitation of centrifuged supernatant.
Secondary: Amicon ultrafiltration
38%
10/26
NA E gene (Bar-Or et al., 2020)
Spain Murcia Untreated wastewater Aluminium flocculation – beef extract precipitation N1: 21/42
N2: 23/42
N3: 27/42
N1: 1.4 × 105
N2: 3.4 × 105
N3: 3.1 × 105
N gene (Randazzo et al., 2020)
Treated wastewater Secondary: 2/18
Tertiary: 0/12
<2.5 × 105
Ourense Untreated wastewater Amicon ultrafiltration of centrifugated supernatant Influent: 5/5 NA N gene
E gene
RdRp gene
(Balboa et al., 2020)
Treated wastewater Primary effluent: 1/4
Effluent: 0/5
Sludge Glycine/beef extract elution –centrifugation – filtration – PEG precipitation 41%
14/34
Valencia Untreated wastewater Aluminium flocculation – beef extract precipitation 80%
12/15
105–106 N gene (Randazzo et al., 2020)
Treated wastewater 0/9 0
Turkey Istanbul Untreated wastewater Amicon ultrafiltration OR PEG precipitation of centrifuged supernatant 77%
7/9
103–106 RdRp gene (Kocamemi et al., 2020)