McManus 1996.
| Methods | ITS | |
| Participants | Australia, pharmaceutical benefits scheme | |
| Interventions | Ceiling + Fixed | |
| Outcomes | Medicine use | |
| Notes | Source of funding is not reported | |
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not applicable (ITS) |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not applicable (ITS) |
| Baseline outcome measurement similarity | Unclear risk | Not applicable (ITS) |
| Baseline characteristics similarity | Unclear risk | Not applicable (ITS) |
| Protection against contamination | Unclear risk | Not applicable (ITS) |
| Intervention independent of other changes | Low risk | Intervention is independent of other relevant changes |
| Shape of the intervention effect pre‐specified | Low risk | Point analysis is the point of intervention |
| Intervention unlikely to affect data collection | Low risk | Sources and methods were the same before and after the intervention |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | Community and elderly/social welfare policies are not differentiated in the outcomes |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Outcomes are objective |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All relevant outcomes in the Methods section are reported in the Results section |
| Other bias | Low risk | No other important bias is detected in the study |