Berrick 1994.
Methods | No control for confounders Demographic comparison using gender and ethnicity |
|
Participants | Kinship n = 246
Foster n = 354 Drawn from the University of California at Berkeley‐Foster Care Database (UCB‐FCD) which contains information on all children in foster care in California from January 1988 through the present time of the study ‐ 1991 |
|
Interventions | See Table 2 | |
Outcomes | Placement Stability ‐ Length of Placement Service Utilization ‐ Mental Health Services Educational Attainment ‐ Repeated a Grade |
|
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No attempt was made to equate the kinship care and foster care groups through controlling for covariates; Evidence on placement characteristics and child demographics was reported on the comparability of the groups |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Kinship care and foster care groups experienced different exposure to the intervention; Groups received different services during placement |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Kinship care and foster care groups were not defined in same way; There was evidence of biased assessment resulting from the type of placement |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | All participants were not accounted for in the reporting of results; Uncertain if attrition could have influenced the results |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Instrumentation used to measure the outcomes was specified completely; Reliability and/or validity information was reported for instrumentation |