Iglehart 1994.
Methods | Demographic comparison using ethnicity, gender, removal reason, placement history, and length of stay | |
Participants | Kinship n = 352
Foster n = 638 Drawn from Los Angeles County data that included only adolescents, 16 years of age and older, in relative placements or in non‐relative foster family placements, as well as, only white, African‐American and Hispanic adolescents |
|
Interventions | See Table 2 | |
Outcomes | Behavioural Development ‐ Behavioural Problems Mental Health ‐ Psychiatric Disorders Educational Attainment ‐ Grade Level |
|
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | High risk | No attempt was made to equate the kinship care and foster care groups through controlling for covariates; Evidence on setting, placement characteristics, and child demographics was reported on the non‐comparability of the groups |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Kinship care and foster care groups did not experience different exposure to the intervention; Uncertain if groups received different services during placement |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Kinship care and foster care groups were defined in same way; There was evidence of biased assessment resulting from the type of placement |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | All participants were accounted for in the reporting of results; Attrition could not have influenced the results |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Instrumentation used to measure the outcomes was specified completely; Reliability and/or validity information was not reported for instrumentation |