Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 31;2014(1):CD006546. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006546.pub3

Iglehart 1994.

Methods Demographic comparison using ethnicity, gender, removal reason, placement history, and length of stay
Participants Kinship n = 352
 Foster n = 638
Drawn from Los Angeles County data that included only adolescents, 16 years of age and older, in relative placements or in non‐relative foster family placements, as well as, only white, African‐American and Hispanic adolescents
Interventions See Table 2
Outcomes Behavioural Development ‐ Behavioural Problems
Mental Health ‐ Psychiatric Disorders
Educational Attainment ‐ Grade Level
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment (selection bias) High risk No attempt was made to equate the kinship care and foster care groups through controlling for covariates; Evidence on setting, placement characteristics, and child demographics was reported on the non‐comparability of the groups
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Kinship care and foster care groups did not experience different exposure to the intervention; Uncertain if groups received different services during placement
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Kinship care and foster care groups were defined in same way; There was evidence of biased assessment resulting from the type of placement
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk All participants were accounted for in the reporting of results; Attrition could not have influenced the results
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Instrumentation used to measure the outcomes was specified completely; Reliability and/or validity information was not reported for instrumentation