Valicenti‐McDermott 2008.
Methods | Demographic and placement comparison on age at entry, number of placements, length of OOH care, sibling placement, developmental disabilities, psychiatric diagnoses | |
Participants | Kinship n = 42 Foster n = 40 Local sample drawn from children evaluated for developmental problems at a University Center in New York City |
|
Interventions | See Table 2 | |
Outcomes | Behavioural Development ‐ Behaviour Problems Mental Health ‐ Psychiatric Disorders; Well‐being Placement Stability ‐ Number of Placements; Length of Stay Permanency ‐ Reunification; Adoption Educational Attainment ‐ Academic Failure Service Utilisation ‐ Physician Services |
|
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No attempt was made to equate the kinship care and foster care groups; Evidence on placement characteristics and child demographics was reported on the comparability of the groups |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Kinship care and foster care groups experienced different exposure to the intervention; Groups received different services during placement |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Uncertain if kinship care and foster care groups were defined in same way; There was no evidence of biased assessment resulting from the type of placement |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | All participants were not accounted for in the reporting of results; Uncertain if attrition could have influenced the results |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Instrumentation used to measure the outcomes was specified completely; Reliability and/or validity information was reported for instrumentation |