Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 30;55(Suppl):S37–S42. doi: 10.5045/br.2020.S007

Table 1.

Summary of major recent clinical trials in transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

Ref. Regimen Cycle of induction N CR rate prior to transplant Median PFS Median OS
Cavo et al. [28] VTD vs. 3 236 19% 3-year PFS; 68% 3-year OS; 86%
TD 238 5% vs. 56% vs. 84%
Rosiñol et al. [29] VTD vs. 6 130 35% 56.2 mo 4-year OS; 74%
TD vs. 127 14% 28.2 mo vs. 70%
VBMCP/VBAD/B 129 0.21 35.3 mo vs. 65%
Moreau et al. [31] VTD vs. 4 169 13% NA NA
VCD 169 8.9%
Rosiñol et al. [33] VRD 6 458 33.4% NA NA
Moreau et al. [37] D-VTD vs. 4 543 39% 18 mo PFS; 93% NA
VTD 542 26% vs. 85%

Abbreviations: CR, complete response; D-VTD; daratumumab, bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone; NA, not evaluable; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; Ref, reference; TD, thalidomide and dexamethasone; VBMCP/VBAD, vincristine, VCD, bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone; VRD, bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone; VTD, bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone.