Duan 2000.
| Methods | Setting: Los Angeles, USA. Recruitment: 30 churches. Recruitment of women was achieved through announcements during services, meetings and events, special open houses and recruitment events. Randomisation: RCT 2 arm. There was no clear definition of peer support, however study met the inclusion criterion of using peers that shared one or several key characteristics of the target population. Peer training: A survey firm trained and supervised peer volunteers. |
|
| Participants | 813 women aged 40 to 80 years. | |
| Interventions | Intervention: One session of telephone counselling was conducted annually for 2 years by trained peer counsellors. The counselling was individualised to address barriers. Women were informed about their risk status and about breast cancer prevalence rates. They were also encouraged to ask their physicians for a referral and information about convenient screening facilities. Thus both educational and behavioural goals were embedded in the intervention. Caller: Calls were made by peer supporters. Control group: No intervention. |
|
| Outcomes |
Method of assessing outcome measures: phone survey |
|
| Notes | ||
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Adequate sequence generation? | Unclear risk | Unclear. |
| Allocation concealment? | Unclear risk | B ‐ Unclear. |
| Blinding? Participants | Unclear risk | Unclear. |
| Blinding? Providers | Unclear risk | Unclear. |
| Blinding? Outcome assessors | Unclear risk | Unclear. |
| Blinding? Data analysts | Unclear risk | Unclear. |
| Incomplete outcome data addressed? All outcomes | Unclear risk | Intention‐to‐treat analysis ‐ not stated. |
| Free of selective reporting? | Low risk | All outcomes reported. |