Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 11;2016(8):CD006967. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006967.pub4

Hancock 2005.

Methods Randomized, double‐blind, cross‐over, controlled trial
Participants Inclusion criteria: confirmed diagnosis of tuberous sclerosis complex and sleep problems (Quine Sleep Index score of ≥ 6 out of a possible 8)
Exclusion criteria: situational sleep disorder (a higher Quine score at home with a score of < 6 elsewhere)
N: 8 (1 lost to follow‐up)
M: 4; F: 3
Age: 18 months to 31 years (median age 9 years)
All participants had epilepsy and on concurrent AEDs; 2 participants were well controlled
All had mental retardation and behavioural difficulties
Duration of the trial (including follow‐up): 6 weeks
Interventions Melatonin 5 mg vs. melatonin 10 mg (see text for more details)
Outcomes Seizure frequency: 4 participants had seizures during the trial, without change in the frequency (or type) of seizures compared with the baseline period before melatonin treatment at either dose
Seizure freedom: 3 participants with well‐controlled epilepsy remained seizure‐free during the trial
Adverse events: none reported
Notes Seizure type was not reported
Concurrent AEDs not reported
Seizure diaries were used to monitor the frequency and type of seizures
Reasons for lost to follow‐up (1 participant) reported
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Allocation made by the pharmacy using random number sequences
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Participants received identical capsules
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Blinding not explicitly reported (insufficient information to permit judgement)
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk No lost to follow‐up
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All data regarding outcomes of interest for this systematic review reported
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Blinding not explicitly reported (insufficient information to permit judgement)
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Blinding not explicitly reported (insufficient information to permit judgement)