Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug;124(8):826–833. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.06.004

Table 1.

Difference-in-differences estimates of changes in emergency admissions and total bed-days rates attributable to the Vanguard integrated care and care home initiatives, by different post-implementation time windows.

1st–3rd year 1st year 2ndyear 3rd year
Monthly emergency admission rate (per, 000 population)
Population-based −0.004 0.011 0.015 −0.031**
[−0.032, 0.024] [−0.021, 0.043] [−0.018, 0.047] [−0.062, −0.001]
Care home −0.042** −0.018 −0.035 −0.065**
[−0.082, −0.002] [−0.050, 0.014] [−0.076, 0.007] [−0.124, −0.006]



Monthly total bed-days rate (per, 00 population)
Population-based 0.011 0.020 0.017 0.001
[−0.017, 0.039] [−0.012, 0.053] [−0.019, 0.053] [−0.029, 0.030]
Care home 0.013 0.019 0.013 0.008
[−0.006, 0.032] [−0.008, 0.046] [−0.013, 0.039] [−0.013, 0.029]

Notes: Figures represent estimated βj parameters of site and time fixed-effect specifications based on the balanced sample (223 sites: 31 population-based sites, 6 care home sites and 186 control sites) that use the full 24-months before implementation (see sub-Section 2.2 for details). Columns 2, 3 and 4 reported estimated net impact computed using a restricted post-intervention sample comprising 12, 12–24, 24–36 months after introduction. 95 % confidence intervals in brackets. Significance levels: * p < 0.10, ** p < 0.05, *** p < 0.01.