Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Immunol. 2020 Apr 7;215:108411. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2020.108411

Table 2.

Comparison of clinical features in PAN and DADA2 *

Adult PAN Childhood PAN DADA2
Average age at diagnosis (yr) 50 9 5
Female (%) 35 50 50
Clinical features
 Recurrent fever (%) 60 80 70
 Myalgia / arthralgia (%) 60 70 50
 Livedo (%) 20 50 70
 Cutaneous vasculitis (%) 60 90 80
 Neurologic manifestations (%) 60 30 60
  CNS involvement (%) 10 20 60
  PNS involvement (%) 70 20 20
 GI manifestations (%) 30 40 40
 Renal manifestations (%) 40 40 20
 Hypertension (%) 40 30 20
Laboratory features **
  Hemoglobin - ↓ (50%)
  WBC - ↓ (50%)
  Platelets - ↓ (20%)
  IgA - - ↓ (40%)
  IgM - - ↓ (50%)
  IgG - - ↓ (30%)

Bold print highlights areas of major difference between DADA2 and PAN

*

Data are approximated based on references [6, 7, 11, 4749]

**

Arrows indicate increased (↑) or decreased (↓) levels compared to healthy controls. The approximate percentage of DADA2 patients with each laboratory feature is provided.