Skip to main content
. 2011 Nov 9;2011(11):CD009170. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009170.pub2

Sullivan 2009.

Methods Study design: randomised controlled trial. Object of randomisation: operations.
Participants USA. Surgeons and assistants performing caesarean sections. Closure of all anatomical layers. Number studied: 194 operations. Intervention group n = 204 surgeon‐operations. Control group n = 204 surgeon‐operations. All gloves collected.
Interventions Use of blunt needles. The control group used sharp needles.
Outcomes Outcome: number of glove perforations per operation. Perforation detection: the gloves were filled with water and perforations were noted as jets of water.
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk computerised random sequence generator
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk surgeon nor assistant blinded to randomisation outcome
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk surgeon nor assistant blinded to randomisation outcome; blinding to type of needle is impossible for surgeons
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk the (testing) author was blind to which needle had been used
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk 100% completion of surveys
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk all outcomes reported