Table 4.
Risk factor | Proximal colon cancer |
Distal colon cancer |
Rectum cancer |
P for overall heterogeneity c | P for linear heterogeneity d | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cecum | Ascending colon | Transverse colon | Overall | Descending colon | Sigmoid colon | Overall | Rectosigmoid | Rectum | Overall | |||
n=474 | n=633 | n=250 | n=1357 | n=221 | n=750 | n=971 | n=202 | n=528 | n=730 | |||
Total fiber intake, per 30g/day | ||||||||||||
HR | 0.93 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 0.92 | 1.36 | 0.86 | 0.95 | 1.55 | 0.59 | 0.77 | ||
95% CI | 0.46–1.86 | 0.60–2.01 | 0.23–1.58 | 0.61–1.39 | 0.49–3.72 | 0.49–1.48 | 0.58–1.54 | 0.55–4.42 | 0.31–1.14 | 0.45–1.34 | 0.30 | 0.45 |
Ptrend | 0.83 | 0.77 | 0.30 | 0.70 | 0.55 | 0.58 | 0.83 | 0.41 | 0.12 | 0.36 | ||
P for heterogeneity within main subsites c | 0.18 | 0.76 | 0.12 | |||||||||
Whole grain intake, per 20 g/day | ||||||||||||
HR | 1.08 | 0.95 | 0.87 | 0.98 | 1.00 | 0.91 | 0.93 | 1.07 | 0.75 | 0.82 | ||
95% CI | 0.91–1.27 | 0.82–1.11 | 0.69–1.10 | 0.88–1.08 | 0.78–1.28 | 0.79–1.04 | 0.82–1.04 | 0.82–1.38 | 0.63–0.88 | 0.71–0.94 | 0.03 | 0.02 |
Ptrend | 0.39 | 0.54 | 0.23 | 0.65 | 0.99 | 0.16 | 0.20 | 0.63 | <0.001 | 0.005 | ||
P for heterogeneity within main subsites c | 0.17 | 0.80 | 0.03 | |||||||||
Cereal fiber intake, per 5 g/day | ||||||||||||
HR | 1.13 | 0.96 | 0.84 | 0.99 | 0.95 | 0.92 | 0.93 | 1.11 | 0.60 | 0.71 | ||
95% CI | 0.87–1.46 | 0.76–1.20 | 0.58–1.21 | 0.85–1.16 | 0.64–1.40 | 0.75–1.13 | 0.77–1.11 | 0.75–1.65 | 0.46–0.77 | 0.57–0.88 | 0.003 | 0.007 |
Ptrend | 0.36 | 0.70 | 0.34 | 0.92 | 0.79 | 0.45 | 0.42 | 0.59 | <0.001 | 0.001 | ||
P for heterogeneity within main subsites c | 0.18 | 0.83 | 0.01 | |||||||||
Vitamin D intake, per 400IU/day | ||||||||||||
HR | 0.87 | 0.81 | 0.70 | 0.80 | 0.81 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.89 | 0.84 | 0.87 | 0.71 | 0.97 |
95% CI | 0.71–1.06 | 0.67–0.96 | 0.53–0.93 | 0.71–0.91 | 0.60–1.09 | 0.64–0.89 | 0.66–0.88 | 0.66–1.21 | 0.69–1.02 | 0.74–1.03 | ||
Ptrend | 0.16 | 0.02 | 0.02 | <0.001 | 0.16 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.47 | 0.07 | 0.10 | ||
P for heterogeneity within main subsites c | 0.30 | 0.84 | 0.78 | |||||||||
Marine omega-3 fatty acid intake, per 0.2 g/day | ||||||||||||
HR | 0.90 | 0.97 | 1.02 | 0.95 | 1.09 | 1.08 | 1.08 | 0.81 | 0.99 | 0.94 | ||
95% CI | 0.76–1.05 | 0.84–1.12 | 0.82–1.27 | 0.86–1.05 | 0.86–1.38 | 0.95–1.23 | 0.97–1.21 | 0.63–1.04 | 0.85–1.15 | 0.82–1.07 | 0.37 | 0.49 |
Ptrend | 0.18 | 0.67 | 0.85 | 0.30 | 0.47 | 0.22 | 0.16 | 0.09 | 0.86 | 0.33 | ||
P for heterogeneity within main subsites c | 0.59 | 0.94 | 0.19 | |||||||||
Total red meat intake, per 3 serving/week | ||||||||||||
HR | 1.02 | 1.04 | 1.14 | 1.05 | 1.05 | 1.04 | 1.04 | 0.97 | 1.07 | 1.05 | ||
95% CI | 0.93–1.12 | 0.96–1.13 | 1.00–1.29 | 1.00–1.11 | 0.92–1.20 | 0.96–1.11 | 0.97–1.11 | 0.84–1.12 | 0.98–1.17 | 0.97–1.13 | ||
Ptrend | 0.70 | 0.36 | 0.046 | 0.07 | 0.47 | 0.34 | 0.24 | 0.65 | 0.11 | 0.22 | ||
P for heterogeneity within main subsites c | 0.19 | 0.72 | 0.15 | 0.46 | 0.82 | |||||||
Processed red meat intake, per 3 serving/week | ||||||||||||
HR | 0.96 | 0.97 | 1.20 | 1.01 | 1.23 | 1.17 | 1.19 | 1.01 | 1.21 | 1.16 | ||
95% CI | 0.78–1.17 | 0.81–1.16 | 0.92–1.57 | 0.90–1.14 | 0.92–1.64 | 1.00–1.37 | 1.03–1.36 | 0.73–1.37 | 1.00–1.46 | 0.99–1.36 | 0.12 | 0.04 |
Ptrend | 0.68 | 0.72 | 0.18 | 0.85 | 0.16 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.98 | 0.04 | 0.07 | ||
P for heterogeneity within main subsites c | 0.18 | 0.64 | 0.23 | |||||||||
Unprocessed red meat intake, per 3 serving/week | ||||||||||||
HR | 1.06 | 1.07 | 1.16 | 1.08 | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.95 | 1.01 | 1.14 | 1.11 | ||
95% CI | 0.92–1.22 | 0.94–1.21 | 0.96–1.41 | 1.00–1.18 | 0.77–1.18 | 0.85–1.06 | 0.86–1.05 | 0.81–1.26 | 1.00–1.30 | 0.99–1.24 | 0.31 | 0.96 |
Ptrend | 0.46 | 0.32 | 0.13 | 0.06 | 0.66 | 0.35 | 0.30 | 0.91 | 0.05 | 0.08 | ||
P for heterogeneity within main subsites c | 0.19 | 0.87 | 0.27 | |||||||||
Total folate intake, per 400μg/day | ||||||||||||
HR | 0.94 | 0.89 | 0.68 | 0.86 | 1.10 | 0.76 | 0.83 | 0.73 | 0.85 | 0.82 | ||
95% CI | 0.76–1.16 | 0.73–1.07 | 0.50–0.92 | 0.76–0.98 | 0.81–1.49 | 0.64–0.91 | 0.71–0.96 | 0.52–1.01 | 0.69–1.04 | 0.69–0.98 | 0.17 | 0.30 |
Ptrend | 0.57 | 0.20 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.56 | 0.002 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.12 | 0.03 | ||
P for heterogeneity within main subsites c | 0.12 | 0.05 | 0.41 | |||||||||
Calcium intake, per 300mg/day | ||||||||||||
HR | 0.96 | 0.95 | 0.88 | 0.94 | 0.87 | 0.83 | 0.84 | 0.90 | 0.92 | 0.91 | ||
95% CI | 0.87–1.05 | 0.88–1.02 | 0.78–1.01 | 0.89–0.99 | 0.76–1.00 | 0.77–0.90 | 0.79–0.90 | 0.79–1.04 | 0.84–1.00 | 0.85–0.98 | 0.06 | 0.19 |
Ptrend | 0.33 | 0.18 | 0.06 | 0.02 | 0.047 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.15 | 0.06 | 0.02 | ||
P for heterogeneity within main subsites c | 0.27 | 0.68 | 0.73 | |||||||||
Empirical dietary inflammatory pattern (EDIP) score, per 1 unit | ||||||||||||
HR | 1.54 | 1.16 | 1.01 | 1.27 | 1.24 | 1.52 | 1.45 | 1.21 | 1.13 | 1.19 | ||
95% CI | 1.06–2.23 | 0.84–1.61 | 0.61–1.69 | 1.02–1.58 | 0.72–2.12 | 1.13–2.05 | 1.12–1.88 | 0.69–2.15 | 0.79–1.60 | 0.89–1.61 | 0.50 | 0.71 |
Ptrend | 0.02 | 0.36 | 0.96 | 0.03 | 0.44 | 0.006 | 0.005 | 0.51 | 0.51 | 0.24 | ||
P for heterogeneity within main subsites c | 0.24 | 0.38 | 0.87 | |||||||||
Empirical dietary index for hyperinsulinemia (EDIH), per 1 unit | ||||||||||||
HR | 1.21 | 1.03 | 2.19 | 1.27 | 2.02 | 1.64 | 1.72 | 0.71 | 1.54 | 1.29 | ||
95% CI | 0.75–1.95 | 0.67–1.58 | 1.16–4.12 | 0.96–1.69 | 1.01–4.03 | 1.13–2.39 | 1.24–2.39 | 0.34–1.48 | 0.98–2.40 | 0.88–1.88 | 0.08 | 0.45 |
Ptrend | 0.44 | 0.90 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.047 | 0.009 | 0.001 | 0.36 | 0.06 | 0.19 | ||
P for heterogeneity within main subsites c | 0.11 | 0.60 | 0.05 |
Age- and cohort-stratified Cox proportional hazards model was used with adjustment for age (continuous), race, height (continuous), family history of colorectal cancer (yes or no), history of lower gastrointestinal endoscopic screening (yes or no), body mass index (continuous), pack-years of smoking (continuous), physical activity (continuous), alcohol intake (continuous), and regular aspirin use (yes or no).
For dietary factors, test for trend was conducted using the median of each quintile as a continuous variable.
Heterogeneity was tested by using meta-regression method with a subsite-specific random effect term as a nominal variable.
Linear heterogeneity was tested by using meta-regression method with a subsite-specific random effect term as an ordinal variable.