Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Urology. 2020 May 14;142:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.05.002

Table 3 –

Characteristics of participants by cohort

Characteristic Cohort 1 (N = 501; 50%) Cohort 2 (N = 499; 50%) p value *
Age 64 (62, 66) 69 (67, 71) <0.0001
Family history, n (%) 26 (5.2) 27 (5.4) 0.9
Prior negative biopsy, n (%) 128 (26) 153 (31) 0.079
Total PSA at diagnosis (ng/ml; N = 992) 4.5 (3.5, 5.5) 6.5 (5.5, 7.5) <0.0001
Clinical T stage, n (%)
 T1a/b/c 273 (54) 266 (53) 0.7
 T2a 72 (14) 78 (16)
 T2b 42 (8.4) 33 (6.6)
 T2c 21 (4.2) 28 (5.6)
 T3/4 19 (3.8) 16 (3.2)
Missing, n (%) 74 (15) 78 (16)
Gleason grade group, n (%)
 1 85 (17) 99 (20) 0.5
 2 180 (36) 187 (37)
 3 142 (28) 129 (26)
 4–5 94 (19) 84 (17)
Education, n (%)
 Less than high school 96 (19) 109 (22) 0.8
 High school 147 (29) 147 (29)
 College 155 (31) 153 (31)
 Postgraduate 74 (15) 70 (14)
 Missing 29 (5.8) 20 (4.0)

PSA = prostate-specific antigen.

Estimates were given as median (quartile 1, quartile 3) or frequency (percentage).

*

p values were calculated using Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous and Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables.