Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Nov 15.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Obes (Lond). 2020 May 15;44(8):1723–1732. doi: 10.1038/s41366-020-0586-7

Table 3.

Summary of associations of maternal o,p’-DDT quartiles with multiple adiposity measures in middle-aged daughters of the CHDS cohort.

Parameters Waist Circumference (WC)1 Body Mass Index (BMI)2 Overweight/Obesity from measured WC3 Overweight/Obesity from measured BMI4
N Subjects 313 311 313 311
Exposure distribution Quartile categories Quartile categories Quartile categories Quartile categories
Outcome distribution Continuous Continuous Categorical Categorical
Estimate Beta (95% CI) Beta (95% CI) RR (95% CI) RR (95% CI)
 Model 15
Ref Ref Ref Ref
5.36 (0.65, 10.1) 1.83 (−0.27, 3.92) 1.00 (0.997, 1.006) 1.41 (1.002, 1.98)
4.95 (0.14, 9.76) 1.82 (−0.32, 3.96) 1.11 (0.95, 1.30) 1.30 (0.94, 1.80)
5.58 (0.97, 10.2) 3.02 (0.98, 5.06) 1.11 (0.95, 1.30) 1.54 (1.13, 2.09)
 Model 26
Ref Ref Ref Convergence issue
5.84 (1.29, 10.4) 2.03 (−0.001, 4.06) 1.00 (0.997, 1.007)
5.56 (0.91, 10.21) 2.09 (0.02, 4.16) 1.11 (0.96, 1.30)
4.67 (0.16, 9.17) 2.69 (0.69, 4.69) 1.11 (0.96, 1.29)
 Model 37
Ref Ref Ref Ref
5.32 (0.92, 9.73) 1.74 (−0.20, 3.68) 0.99 (0.89, 1.09) 1.25 (0.95, 1.66)
5.12 (0.59, 9.65) 1.93 (−0.06, 3.93) 1.14 (0.98, 1.33) 1.22 (0.90, 1.65)
4.73 (0.35, 9.11) 2.77 (0.86, 4.69) 1.12 (0.93, 1.36) 1.42 (1.08, 1.87)

Beta=model coefficient, RR=Relative Risk, 95% CI=95% Confidence Interval

1

Association of waist circumference (cm, continuous) with o,p’-DDT (quartiles 2, 3 and 4 vs. quartile 1) was estimated from a mixed linear regression model.

2

Association of BMI (kg/m2, continuous) with o,p’-DDT (quartiles 2,3 and 4 vs. quartile 1) was estimated from a mixed linear regression model.

3

Waist circumference was coded as a 3-category outcome variable representing waist circumference ≤79 cm, 80–87 cm and ≥88 cm. Associations with waist circumference were estimated using a generalized log-linear multinomial model.

4

Body mass index reported in column 6 was based on measured height and weight and in column 7 was based on self-reported heaviest weight. Both BMI measures were coded as a 3-category outcome variables representing BMI <25, 25–29, and ≥30 kg/m2. Associations with BMI were estimated using a generalized log-linear multinomial model.

5

Model 1 includes o,p’-DDT coded as 3 dummy variables representing quartiles 2, 3 and 4 vs. quartile 1 as the reference.

6

Model 2 includes o,p’-DDT coded as 3 dummy variables representing quartiles 2, 3 and 4 vs. quartile 1 as the reference and is adjusted for mothers of subjects’ characteristics: pre-pregnancy BMI (<25, 25–29, ≥30 kg/m2), education (<high school, ≥high school), foreign birthplace (yes, no); and, study subjects’ characteristic: menopause (none, any).

7

Model 3 includes o,p’-DDT coded as 3 dummy variables representing quartiles 2, 3 and 4 vs. quartile 1 as the reference and is adjusted for mothers of subjects’ characteristics: pre-pregnancy BMI (<25, 25–29, ≥30 kg/m2), education (<high school, ≥high school), foreign birthplace (yes, no); and, study subjects’ characteristics: menopause (none, any), exercise (continuous hours/week) and physician-diagnosed and medicated thyroid condition (yes, no). This model not provided for historically highest BMI since that outcome precedes several of these characteristics.