Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan 31;2013(1):CD003611. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003611.pub3

Wilkes 2002.

Study characteristics
Methods Double‐blind, randomized, controlled
Participants Elective on‐pump CABG only
Interventions Magnesium vs. Control
Outcomes AF; Mortality; CV Mortality
Follow‐Up 3 days
Concurrent Antiarrhythmic Medications Beta‐blockers
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk "Patients were allocated to one of two groups by random numbers generated from random‐number tables"
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk "Patients were allocated to one of two groups by random numbers generated from random‐number tables"
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Low risk "To administer magnesium sulfate on the basis of ionized magnesium plasma levels and repeat this intervention as required, one nominated investigator remained unblinded to treatment group. All other clinicians involved in the care of patients and technicians concerned with the analysis of Holter tapes were rigorously blinded throughout the study period."
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Low risk "To administer magnesium sulfate on the basis of ionized magnesium plasma levels and repeat this intervention as required, one nominated investigator remained unblinded to treatment group. All other clinicians involved in the care of patients and technicians concerned with the analysis of Holter tapes were rigorously blinded throughout the study period."
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes High risk "Another two patients underwent mediastinal reexploration for bleeding complications (one  in each group). All of these patients were excluded from further analysis of postoperative cardiac rhythm"
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Protocol not available
Intention‐to‐treat analysis Unclear risk Not reported