Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug;28(8):1071–1078. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2020.04.011

Table II.

The table shows results of logistic regression analysis between 2D hip shape modes (HSMs) and Croft score ≥2 in 4,098 individuals. Results show odds ratio of having a Croft score ≥2 per standard deviation increase in hip shape mode [95% confidence intervals] and P-value. Adjusted = adjusted analysis for age, weight, height, site and race. ∗P < 0.005

Unadjusted Croft ≥2
Adjusted Croft ≥2
OR [95% CI] P OR [95% CI] P
HSM 1 1.08 [0.86–1.36] 0.52 1.11 [0.87–1.40] 0.41
HSM 2 0.81 [0.73–0.91] 2.05 × 10−04 0.82 [0.74–0.92] 8.04 × 10−04
HSM 3 0.79 [0.70–0.89] 1.28 × 10−04 0.76 [0.67–0.86] 1.51 × 10−05
HSM 4 0.72 [0.64–0.80] 1.24 × 10−08 0.71 [0.63–0.79] 8.83 × 10−09
HSM 5 0.95 [0.84–1.08] 0.47 1.03 [0.91–1.17] 0.64
HSM 6 1.12 [0.98–1.28] 0.10 1.06 [0.93–1.22] 0.38
HSM 7 0.94 [0.82–1.07] 0.34 0.92 [0.81–1.06] 0.25
HSM 8 0.92 [0.82–1.04] 0.18 0.95 [0.84–1.07] 0.39
HSM 9 1.13 [1.01–1.26] 0.03 1.20 [1.07–1.35] 2.08 × 10−03
HSM 10 1.00 [0.88–1.13] 0.98 0.95 [0.84–1.09] 0.48