Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 8;29(12):1507–1517. doi: 10.1089/lap.2019.0550

Table 3.

Procedure and Recovery Results of Studies Included in the Meta-Analysis

Study Procedure time (minutes) Time to discharge (hours) Time to return to normal activities (days) Time to return to work (days)
Bongers et al.15 39 ± 23 4.4 ± 3.1
Brölmann et al.16
Garza-Leal17
Braun et al.18 114 ± 60 6.8 ± 3.2
Brucker et al.19 66 ± 24 10.0 ± 5.5 20.5 (5, 103)a 10.0 (2, 86)a
Hahn et al.20
Krämer et al.21
Carrafiello et al.22 20 (15, 25)b
Cho et al.23 — (10, 40)
Cho et al.24
Chudnoff et al.25 126 ± 60 9.0 (2, 60)a 5.0 (0, 29)a
Galen et al.26
Guido et al.27
Berman et al.28
Chudnoff et al.29 47 ± 30 2.5 ± 1.2 2.2 ± 2.2 3.6 ± 2.6
Miller and Osman30
Galen et al.31 140 (42, 290)a 4.5 (1, 11)b 4.0 (2, 10)a
Garza-Leal et al.32
Robles et al.33
Ghezzi et al.34 25 (20, 45)a 18c
Bergamini et al.35
Iversen and Dueholm36
Iversen et al.37
Jiang et al.38 25 (20, 30)b
Kim et al.39 18 ± 5
Lee et al.40
Marcos et al.41 36 ± 11 12.0 (8, 24)b
Meng et al.42
Rattray et al.43 73 ± 26 6.7 ± 3.0 11.1 ± 7.6
Rey et al.44 17 (11, 44)b
Turtulici et al.45 28 (16, 43)b
Wu et al.46 — (20, 40) 2.5c
POOLED RESULTd 49 (41–56) 8.2 (6.3–10.0) 5.2 (3.3–7.1) 5.1 (3.7–6.5)
Laparoscopic RFA 73 (56–91) 10.7 (5.9–15.5) 9.0 (3.8–14.1) 6.5 (3.8–9.2)
Transvaginal RFA 24 (20–28) 2.5 (2.4–2.6)
TFA 44 (36–51) 2.5 (2.3–2.7) 3.3 (1.1–5.4) 3.6 (3.1–4.1)
a

Median (min, max).

b

Mean (min, max).

c

Estimated value.

d

Pooled results derived from random effects meta-analysis and reported as weighted mean (95% confidence interval).

RFA, radiofrequency ablation; TFA, transcervical fibroid ablation.