Comparison 7. Colloid vs crystalloid.

Outcome or subgroup title	No. of studies	No. of participants	Statistical method	Effect size
7.1 Women with hypotension requiring intervention	27	2009	Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	0.69 [0.58, 0.81]
7.2 Women with hypertension requiring intervention	3	327	Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	0.64 [0.09, 4.46]
7.3 Women with cardiac dysrhythmia	6		Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	Subtotals only
7.3.1 Tachycardia	1	60	Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	1.10 [0.79, 1.53]
7.3.2 Bradycardia	5	413	Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	0.98 [0.54, 1.78]
7.4 Women with nausea and/or vomiting	15		Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	Subtotals only
7.4.1 Nausea and/or vomiting	14	1058	Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	0.89 [0.66, 1.19]
7.4.2 Nausea	5	390	Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	1.10 [0.77, 1.58]
7.4.3 Vomiting	4	320	Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	1.35 [0.55, 3.27]
7.5 Neonates with acidosis (pH < 7.2)	6	678	Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	0.83 [0.15, 4.52]
7.6 Neonates: Apgar score	12		Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	Subtotals only
7.6.1 Apgar < 7 at 5 min	2	127	Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	0.16 [0.01, 2.90]
7.6.2 Apgar < 8 at 5 min	10	730	Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	0.24 [0.03, 2.05]