Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 1;2020(7):CD002251. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002251.pub4

Comparison 10. Colloid preload vs colloid coload.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
10.1 Women with hypotension requiring intervention 4 320 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.93 [0.78, 1.10]
10.2 Women with cardiac dysrhythmia 3   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
10.2.1 Bradycardia 2 82 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.75 [0.20, 2.88]
10.2.2 Tachycardia 1 46 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Not estimable
10.3 Women with nausea and/or vomiting 2   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
10.3.1 Nausea and/or vomiting 1 178 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.92 [0.63, 1.35]
10.3.2 Nausea 1 46 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.00 [0.15, 6.51]
10.3.3 Vomiting 1 46 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Not estimable
10.4 Women with anaphylaxis 1 178 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Not estimable
10.5 Neonates with Apgar score < 7 at 5 min 1 36 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Not estimable