Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 1;2020(7):CD002251. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002251.pub4

Comparison 29. Phenylephrine: different doses.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
29.1 Women with hypotension requiring intervention 1 117 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 8.17 [1.04, 64.30]
29.1.1 50 μg/mL vs 100 μg/mL 1 117 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 8.17 [1.04, 64.30]
29.2 Women with hypertension requiring intervention 1 117 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.23 [0.05, 1.02]
29.2.1 50 μg/mL vs 100 μg/mL 1 117 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.23 [0.05, 1.02]
29.3 Women with cardiac dysrhythmia 1 117 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.11 [0.01, 0.80]
29.3.1 Bradycardia: 50 μg/mL vs 100 μg/mL 1 117 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.11 [0.01, 0.80]
29.4 Women with nausea and/or vomiting 1 117 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 3.50 [0.37, 32.67]
29.4.1 Nausea and vomiting: 50 μg/mL vs 100 μg/mL 1 117 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 3.50 [0.37, 32.67]
29.5 Neonatal cord blood pH < 7.2 1 117 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Not estimable
29.5.1 50 μg/mL vs 100 μg/mL 1 117 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Not estimable
29.6 Neonatal Apgar score < 8 at 5 min 1 117 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Not estimable
29.6.1 50 μg/mL vs 100 μg/mL 1 117 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Not estimable