Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 1;2020(7):CD002251. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002251.pub4

Comparison 30. Glycopyrrolate vs control.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
30.1 Women with hypotension requiring intervention 2 142 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.63 [0.21, 1.91]
30.2 Women with hypertension requiring intervention 1 93 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 2.67 [1.31, 5.43]
30.3 Women with bradycardia 1 93 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.21 [0.01, 4.32]
30.4 Women with nausea and/or vomiting 2   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
30.4.1 Nausea or vomiting 1 93 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 2.49 [0.69, 9.04]
30.4.2 Nausea 1 49 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.61 [0.36, 1.06]
30.4.3 Vomiting 1 49 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.52 [0.10, 2.59]
30.5 Neonates with Apgar score < 8 at 5 min 2 142 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Not estimable