Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 1;2020(7):CD002251. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002251.pub4

Alahuhta 1992.

Study characteristics
Methods RCT
Participants 19 women
Inclusion criteria: healthy women undergoing elective caesarean under spinal anaesthesia (38‐42 weeks' gestation) for fetal breech presentation or cephalopelvic disproportion in otherwise uncomplicated singleton pregnancies
Exclusion criteria: not reported
Setting: Finland
Interventions Ephedrine versus phenylephrine
Group 1 (n = 9): ephedrine (mean 27.9 mg, range 16.7 to 32.5)
Group 2 (n = 8): phenylephrine (mean 488 µg, range 334 to 767)
Standardised anaesthetic technique for all women but variable heavy 0.5% bupivicaine dose (range 2.3‐2.6 mL)
Outcomes Maternal: hypotension (defined as a fall in SAP of more than 10 mmHg from baseline); heart rate
Neonatal: arterial umbilical blood < pH 7.2; Apgar < 8 at 5 min; fetal heart rate; birthweight
Notes Hypotension requiring intervention: not stated
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Not reported
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not reported
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Low risk Described as "double blind" – third‐party preparation and coding of solutions
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Not reported
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Low risk Losses to follow‐up: 2/19 – 1 from each group; 1 technical failure, 1 maternal bradycardia requiring atropine treatment
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Not all expected outcomes were reported
Other bias High risk Similar baseline characteristics
Variable dose of local anaesthetic used for spinal anaesthesia