Alahuhta 1992.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | RCT | |
Participants | 19 women Inclusion criteria: healthy women undergoing elective caesarean under spinal anaesthesia (38‐42 weeks' gestation) for fetal breech presentation or cephalopelvic disproportion in otherwise uncomplicated singleton pregnancies Exclusion criteria: not reported Setting: Finland |
|
Interventions |
Ephedrine versus phenylephrine Group 1 (n = 9): ephedrine (mean 27.9 mg, range 16.7 to 32.5) Group 2 (n = 8): phenylephrine (mean 488 µg, range 334 to 767) Standardised anaesthetic technique for all women but variable heavy 0.5% bupivicaine dose (range 2.3‐2.6 mL) |
|
Outcomes | Maternal: hypotension (defined as a fall in SAP of more than 10 mmHg from baseline); heart rate Neonatal: arterial umbilical blood < pH 7.2; Apgar < 8 at 5 min; fetal heart rate; birthweight | |
Notes | Hypotension requiring intervention: not stated | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not reported |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not reported |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Described as "double blind" – third‐party preparation and coding of solutions |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not reported |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Losses to follow‐up: 2/19 – 1 from each group; 1 technical failure, 1 maternal bradycardia requiring atropine treatment |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Not all expected outcomes were reported |
Other bias | High risk | Similar baseline characteristics Variable dose of local anaesthetic used for spinal anaesthesia |