Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 1;2020(7):CD002251. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002251.pub4

Amaro 1998.

Study characteristics
Methods Randomisation: method not described
Participants 40 women
Inclusion criteria: ASA I, term, singleton, cephalic, elective CS
Exclusion criteria: not specified
Setting: Brazil
Interventions Crawford's wedge versus uterine displacement
Group 1 (n = 20): wedged lateral position using modified Crawford's wedge (15 degrees left lateral tilt)
Group 2 (n = 20): manual uterine displacement by surgical assistant
All women received a standardised preload and standardised spinal anaesthetic technique and dose
Outcomes Maternal: hypotension, magnitude of BP reduction and time of occurrence, block height, ephedrine consumption, induction – and hysterotomy – birth times.
Neonatal: umbilical artery pH (expressed as mean and SD), Apgar scores at 1 min and 5 min
Notes Hypotension defined as decrease in SBP > 20% baseline or < 100 mmHg absolute
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Randomisation methods not described
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not reported
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Not reported
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Not reported
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Losses to follow‐up not stated
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk None apparent
Other bias Low risk None apparent