Amaro 1998.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Randomisation: method not described | |
Participants | 40 women Inclusion criteria: ASA I, term, singleton, cephalic, elective CS Exclusion criteria: not specified Setting: Brazil |
|
Interventions |
Crawford's wedge versus uterine displacement Group 1 (n = 20): wedged lateral position using modified Crawford's wedge (15 degrees left lateral tilt) Group 2 (n = 20): manual uterine displacement by surgical assistant All women received a standardised preload and standardised spinal anaesthetic technique and dose |
|
Outcomes |
Maternal: hypotension, magnitude of BP reduction and time of occurrence, block height, ephedrine consumption, induction – and hysterotomy – birth times. Neonatal: umbilical artery pH (expressed as mean and SD), Apgar scores at 1 min and 5 min |
|
Notes | Hypotension defined as decrease in SBP > 20% baseline or < 100 mmHg absolute | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Randomisation methods not described |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not reported |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not reported |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not reported |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Losses to follow‐up not stated |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | None apparent |
Other bias | Low risk | None apparent |