Grubb 2004.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | RCT | |
Participants | 24 women Inclusion criteria: pregnant women scheduled for elective caesarean |
|
Interventions |
Ephedrine versus control Group 1: ephedrine, 50 mg IM Group 2: saline IM Study drugs administered prior to spinal anaesthetic All women received standardised volume loading and a standardised spinal anaesthetic technique and dose followed by standardised surgical positioning. |
|
Outcomes | Maternal: hypotension; nausea | |
Notes | Hypotension was defined as defined as SBP < 70% baseline or < 90 mmHg | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Methods not described |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Methods not described |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Blinding: described as "double‐blind placebo‐controlled" – no further details |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | As above |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Losses to follow‐up: not stated but losses unlikely |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | None apparent |
Other bias | Low risk | None apparent |