Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 1;2020(7):CD002251. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002251.pub4

Grubb 2004.

Study characteristics
Methods RCT
Participants 24 women
Inclusion criteria: pregnant women scheduled for elective caesarean
Interventions Ephedrine versus control
Group 1: ephedrine, 50 mg IM
Group 2: saline IM
Study drugs administered prior to spinal anaesthetic
All women received standardised volume loading and a standardised spinal anaesthetic technique and dose followed by standardised surgical positioning.
Outcomes Maternal: hypotension; nausea
Notes Hypotension was defined as defined as SBP < 70% baseline or < 90 mmHg
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Methods not described
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Methods not described
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Blinding: described as "double‐blind placebo‐controlled" – no further details
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk As above
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Losses to follow‐up: not stated but losses unlikely
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk None apparent
Other bias Low risk None apparent