Imam 2012.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | RCT | |
Participants | 90 women Inclusion criteria: ASA I‐II, elective CS under spinal anaesthesia Setting: Pakistan |
|
Interventions |
Crystalloid preload versus ephedrine alone versus combination of preload + ephedrine Group 1 (crystalloid group): fluid preload with Ringer's solution 20 mL/kg over 10‐15 min prior to intrathecal injection Group 2 (ephedrine group): IV ephedrine 0.25 mg/kg immediately after intrathecal injection Group 3 (combination group): fluid preload with Ringer's solution 20 mL/kg over 10‐15 min preceding intrathecal injection plus ephedrine 0.25 mg/kg immediately after intrathecal injection Spinal anaesthesia technique was not described. |
|
Outcomes | Maternal: hypotension, nausea and vomiting | |
Notes | Hypotension was not defined. It was not clear if they were assessing systolic, diastolic or mean BPs. | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | States "randomised" but no elaboration |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not reported |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | States "blind" but no elaboration |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | States "blind" but no elaboration |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | None reported |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | None apparent |
Other bias | Low risk | None apparent |