Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 1;2020(7):CD002251. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002251.pub4

Imam 2012.

Study characteristics
Methods RCT
Participants 90 women
Inclusion criteria: ASA I‐II, elective CS under spinal anaesthesia
Setting: Pakistan
Interventions Crystalloid preload versus ephedrine alone versus combination of preload + ephedrine
Group 1 (crystalloid group): fluid preload with Ringer's solution 20 mL/kg over 10‐15 min prior to intrathecal injection
Group 2 (ephedrine group): IV ephedrine 0.25 mg/kg immediately after intrathecal injection
Group 3 (combination group): fluid preload with Ringer's solution 20 mL/kg over 10‐15 min preceding intrathecal injection plus ephedrine 0.25 mg/kg immediately after intrathecal injection
Spinal anaesthesia technique was not described.
Outcomes Maternal: hypotension, nausea and vomiting
Notes Hypotension was not defined. It was not clear if they were assessing systolic, diastolic or mean BPs.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk States "randomised" but no elaboration
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not reported
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk States "blind" but no elaboration
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk States "blind" but no elaboration
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk None reported
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk None apparent
Other bias Low risk None apparent