Khan 2013.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | RCT | |
Participants | 100 women Inclusion criteria: ASA I‐II, age 20‐35, single pregnancy, elective caesarean under spinal anaesthesia Exclusion criteria: hypertension, congestive cardiac failure, cardiovascular disease, fetal distress, any contraindication to spinal anaesthesia, > 800 mL blood loss in theatre Setting: India |
|
Interventions |
Crystalloid preload versus crystalloid coload Group 1: preload of 20 mL/kg of Ringer's lactate over 20 min Group 2: coload of 20 mL/kg of Ringer's lactate at the maximal possible rate by pressurise giving set All women received no premedication, standardised cannulation, no further IV fluid except to keep IV line patent, standardised spinal anaesthetic technique and dose and standardised oxytocin postdelivery. Hypotension was treated with boluses of ephedrine 5 mg |
|
Outcomes |
Maternal: incidence of hypotension, height of sensory block, systolic/diastolic/mean BP, ephedrine requirement Neonatal: Apgar sores at 1 min and 5 min |
|
Notes | Hypotension was defined as decrease in SBP > 20% from baseline or decrease of systolic pressure to < 90‐100 mmHg | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not reported |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not reported |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | No blinding, but protocol well defined and seems unlikely to have affected results |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | No blinding, but protocol well defined and seems unlikely to have affected results |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Not reported |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Not apparent |
Other bias | Low risk | Not apparent |