Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 1;2020(7):CD002251. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002251.pub4

King 1998.

Study characteristics
Methods RCT
Participants 30 women
Inclusion criteria: undergoing elective CS
Exclusion criteria: hypertension, pre‐eclampsia, preterm labour, juvenile diabetes, cocaine and methamphetamine use and cardiac disease
Interventions Ephedrine versus ephedrine + crystalloid versus crystalloid
Group 1: ephedrine infusion group: 10 mL saline bolus followed by ephedrine infusion 1 mg/mL, i.e. 20 mg in 12 min
Group 2: ephedrine bolus group: 10 mg ephedrine followed by saline infusion 5 mL/min for 2 min followed by 1 mL/min for 10 min
Group 3: saline bolus 2 mL followed by infusion 5 mL/min for 2 min followed by 1 mL/min for 10 min
All women received a standardised crystalloid preload followed by standardised infusion, a standardised spinal anaesthetic technique and dose and standardised positioning.
Outcomes Maternal: hypotension; time to first ephedrine rescue dose; number of hypotensive participants; total ephedrine dose
Neonatal: Apgar scores at 1 min and 5 min
Notes Hypotension was defined as SBP < 80% baseline
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Method not described
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Adequate: study drugs prepared by a third party (pharmacy)
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Low risk Blinding: anaesthetist blinded to interventions
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk As above
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Losses to follow‐up: not stated
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk None apparent
Other bias Low risk None apparent