King 1998.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | RCT | |
Participants | 30 women Inclusion criteria: undergoing elective CS Exclusion criteria: hypertension, pre‐eclampsia, preterm labour, juvenile diabetes, cocaine and methamphetamine use and cardiac disease |
|
Interventions |
Ephedrine versus ephedrine + crystalloid versus crystalloid Group 1: ephedrine infusion group: 10 mL saline bolus followed by ephedrine infusion 1 mg/mL, i.e. 20 mg in 12 min Group 2: ephedrine bolus group: 10 mg ephedrine followed by saline infusion 5 mL/min for 2 min followed by 1 mL/min for 10 min Group 3: saline bolus 2 mL followed by infusion 5 mL/min for 2 min followed by 1 mL/min for 10 min All women received a standardised crystalloid preload followed by standardised infusion, a standardised spinal anaesthetic technique and dose and standardised positioning. |
|
Outcomes |
Maternal: hypotension; time to first ephedrine rescue dose; number of hypotensive participants; total ephedrine dose Neonatal: Apgar scores at 1 min and 5 min |
|
Notes | Hypotension was defined as SBP < 80% baseline | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Method not described |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Adequate: study drugs prepared by a third party (pharmacy) |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Blinding: anaesthetist blinded to interventions |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | As above |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Losses to follow‐up: not stated |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | None apparent |
Other bias | Low risk | None apparent |