Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 1;2020(7):CD002251. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002251.pub4

Loo 2002.

Study characteristics
Methods RCT
Participants 40 women
Inclusion criteria: undergoing elective CS, ASA I, age 18 to 40 years, height > 150 cm, weight < 100 kg, full‐term singleton fetus with no congenital abnormalities, no polyhydramnios, no intrauterine growth retardation, and estimated fetal weight > 2500 g
Interventions Ephedrine + crystalloid co‐load versus crystalloid preload
Group 1: prophylactic ephedrine 6 mg IV and 1000 mL Ringer's lactate commenced immediately after spinal anaesthesia
Group 2: preload of 1000 mL Ringer's lactate
All women received a standardised spinal anaesthetic technique and dose.
Outcomes Maternal: hypotension (defined as SBP < 100 mmHg); BP; heart rate; time to block; ephedrine dose
Neonatal: Apgar scores
Notes Hypotension defined as SBP < 100 mmHg
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Method not described
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Allocation concealment: "divided into two groups"
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Blinding: described as "double‐blinded" but no further details provided
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk As above
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Losses to follow‐up: not stated
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Unclear reporting
Other bias Low risk None apparent