Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 1;2020(7):CD002251. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002251.pub4

Ngan Kee 2004a.

Study characteristics
Methods RCT
Participants 50 women
Inclusion criteria: term singleton pregnancies scheduled for elective caesarean under spinal anaesthesia
Exclusion criteria: pre‐existing or pregnancy‐induced hypertension, cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease, known fetal abnormality or contraindication to spinal anaesthesia
Setting: Hong Kong, China
Interventions Phenylephrine versus control
Group 1: phenylephrine IV immediately after intrathecal injection; 100 µg/min for 3 min
Group 2: control (saline infusion plus rescue IV bolus of phenylephrine (100 µg) when SAP < 80% baseline
Note: women in the phenylephrine group were given phenylephrine 100 µg/min whenever SAP was less than baseline.
All women received a standardised spinal anaesthetic technique and dose.
Outcomes Maternal: hypotension; BP; nausea and vomiting; bradycardia requiring intervention; phenylephrine dose; incision to birth time
Neonatal: umbilical arterial blood gases; umbilical venous blood gases; Apgar scores
Notes Hypotension defined as SAP < 80% baseline
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk "Computer‐generated randomization codes"
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk "Codes contained in sealed, sequentially numbered envelopes"
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Low risk "Double blind"; "two identical syringes"; investigators and women were blinded to the contents of the syringes
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk As above
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Low risk Losses to follow‐up: none (although there was insufficient cord blood to measure pH in 1 neonate)
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Appears to report all
Other bias Low risk None evident