Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 1;2020(7):CD002251. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002251.pub4

Ngan Kee 2013a.

Study characteristics
Methods RCT
Participants 104 participants
Inclusion criteria: ASA I‐II, age > 18 years, term singleton pregnancy, elective caesarean under spinal anaesthesia
Exclusion criteria: pre‐existing or gestational hypertension, abnormality of fetus, onset of uterine contraction, coagulopathy, thrombocytopenia, cerebrovascular or cardiovascular disease, any contraindication to the use of spinal anaesthesia, height > 180 cm or < 140 cm, weight > 100 kg or < 50 kg
Setting: Hong Kong, China
Interventions Prophylactic glycopyrrolate versus control
Group 1: single IV bolus of glycopyrrolate 4μg/kg diluted in saline to 2 mL administered at commencement of spinal injection
Group 2: single IV bolus 2 mL saline placebo administered at commencement of spinal injection
All women received standardised aspiration prophylaxis, standardised monitoring, standardised positioning, standardised cannulation, a standardised spinal anaesthetic technique and dose, and standardised crystalloid coload.
BP maintained using infusion of phenylephrine 100 μg/mL using a computer controlled closed‐loop feedback infusion.
Outcomes Maternal: total dose and median rate of phenylephrine infusion, total amount of IV fluid given, number of episodes of hypotension, nausea and vomiting
Neonatal: Apgar scores, umbilical cord gases
Notes Hypotension was defined as SBP < 80% of baseline.
Hypertension was defined as SBP > 120% of baseline.
Bradycardia was defined as heart rate < 50 bpm.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Computer‐generated random codes
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Sealed opaque sequentially numbered envelopes
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Low risk Yes, both blinded
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Low risk Blinded
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Low risk Group 1 – 5 excluded due to severe shivering, infusion tubing fault, computer cable fault
Group 2 – 6 excluded due to severe shivering, infusion tubing fault
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Appears all reported
Other bias Low risk None evident