Pouliou 2006.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | RCT | |
Participants | 60 women Inclusion criteria: ASA I‐II women aged 18‐45 having elective LSCS under spinal anaesthesia No exclusion criteria mentioned in abstract Setting: Greece |
|
Interventions |
Pre‐spinal anaesthesia IM ephedrine versus delayed IV ephedrine Group 1: ephedrine IM 37.5 mg 15 min before spinal Group 2: ephedrine 15 mg IV 2 min after spinal anaesthesia All women received a standardised crystalloid preload followed by a standardised spinal anaesthetic technique and dose |
|
Outcomes | Maternal: incidence/severity of hypotension | |
Notes | Hypotension classified as "mild" (decrease of 20% from baseline) or "severe" (decrease of < 30% from baseline) | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | "Double‐randomised" but no details as to how |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not reported |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Unable to be blinded |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not reported |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not reported |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Unclear reporting |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Unclear reporting |