Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 1;2020(7):CD002251. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002251.pub4

Ramin 1994.

Study characteristics
Methods RCT
Participants 32 women
Inclusion criteria: healthy pregnant women undergoing elective caesarean at term (38 to 40 weeks' gestation) with spinal anaesthesia
Exclusion criteria: women in labour, hypertension, diabetes, platelet counts < 100,000 mm3, prolonged thromboplastin time, fetal distress, cardiac or pulmonary disease, any medical illness, or a known history of drug abuse
Interventions Prophylactic angiotensin versus prophylactic ephedrine versus control
Group 1: angiotensin II (1000 ng/mL in 0.9% sodium chloride)
Group 2: ephedrine (1 mg/mL)
Group 3: control (no prophylactic intervention)
All women received a standardised crystalloid preload and a standardised spinal anaesthetic technique with slight variation in spinal anaesthetic doses.
Outcomes Maternal: hypotension (defined as decrease of > 30% from baseline); arterial BP (mean and SD);
angiotensin levels
Neonatal: Apgar scores at 1 min and 5 min (mean and SD); pH < 7.2; umbilical artery pH (mean and SD); umbilical venous pH (mean and SD); pCO2; BE
Notes Hypotension was defined as a decrease in BP of > 30% from baseline.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk "Randomised" but method otherwise not described
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Method not described
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Blinding not stated
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Blinding not stated
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Low risk Losses to follow‐up: 2/32 – 1 woman in the control group with a fetal death; 1 woman (group not specified) gave birth before her scheduled procedure
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Unclear reporting
Other bias Unclear risk Unclear reporting