Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 1;2020(7):CD002251. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002251.pub4

Romdhani 2014.

Study characteristics
Methods RCT
Participants 105 patients undergoing elective caesarean section
Inclusion criteria: term singleton pregnancies, not in labour, elective caesarean, appropriate for spinal anaesthesia
Exclusion criteria: pre‐eclampsia, weight > 110 kg, < 150 cm tall, allergy to HES, known fetal abnormalities, contraindication for spinal anaesthesia, sensitive block height that exceeded T4,
haemodynamic instability caused by a surgical complication, failed spinal anaesthesia
Setting: Tunisia
Interventions HES vs crystalloid preload
Group 1: 500 mL of 6% HES 130/0.4
Group 2: 1500 mL of 9% normal saline solution
Both groups received bolus 30 min prior to spinal anaesthesia
Both groups received rescue ephedrine
Outcomes Maternal: hypotension; heart rate; dose of ephedrine; nausea and vomiting
Neonatal: umbilical blood pH; Apgar at 1 min and 5 min
Notes Hypotension defined as a 20% drop in systolic blood pressure from baseline.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Computer‐generated
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not stated
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes High risk Not blinded
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Not blinded
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Not reported
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Most expected outcomes reported
Other bias Low risk Not apparent