Skip to main content
. 2012 Jun 13;2012(6):CD006818. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006818.pub2

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Telemedicine for the support of parents of high‐risk newborn infants.

Telemedicine for the support of parents of high‐risk newborn infants
Patient or population: parents of high‐risk newborn infants 
 Settings: NICU 
 Intervention: Telemedicine
Outcomes Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI) Relative effect 
 (95% CI) No of Participants 
 (studies) Quality of the evidence 
 (GRADE) Comments
Assumed risk Corresponding risk
Control Telemedicine
Length of hospital stay 
 Days 
 Follow‐up: 4 months The mean length of hospital stay in the control groups was 
 70.6 days The mean length of hospital stay in the intervention groups was 
 2.10 lower 
 (18.85 lower to 14.65 higher)   56 
 (1 study) ⊕⊝⊝⊝ 
 very low Quality assessment of the included study ‐ overall minor downgrade, small sample and major imprecision in the estimate of effects.
*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g., the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI). 
 CI: Confidence interval
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence 
 High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect 
 Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate 
 Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate 
 Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate