Rowland 2003.
| Methods | Design: Cluster‐randomised controlled trial Duration of follow‐up: 14 months |
|
| Participants | Country: United Kingdom Setting: Urban primary schools Intervention group n=714 Control group n=672 Age: year 2 & 5 primary schoolchildren. 56% female (intervention group), 49% female (control group). |
|
| Interventions | 16 hours of expert assistance from school travel co‐ordinators over one year. School travel co‐ordinators provide advice on road safety and travel plan development, and facilitate travel plan implementation. Duration of intervention: 14 months |
|
| Outcomes | Travel mode: mode of travel to school on the day of the survey Effects on inequalities not reported. Adverse effects not reported. |
|
| Notes | 2 of 11 intervention schools opted out of the project following randomisation. Analysis adjusted for baseline travel. | |
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Adequate sequence generation? | Low risk | Randomisation by software programme |
| Allocation concealment? | Low risk | Randomisation by independent statistician |
| Blinding? All outcomes | High risk | Not feasible. Could have influenced outcome. |
| Incomplete outcome data addressed? All outcomes | Low risk | 95% of schools completed follow‐up survey, and 85% of children in those schools completed the survey. Thus, loss to follow‐up relatively small. |
| Free of selective reporting? | Unclear risk | Not clear that all pre‐specified outcomes were included |
| Free of other bias? | Low risk | No other sources of bias identified |
| Adequate matching of intervention / control groups? | Low risk | Randomised. Similar at baseline except for presence of other safety programmes (intervention schools 55%, control schools 30%) ‐ unlikely to have had a major effect on travel mode outcomes |