Sargeant 2004 New Recruit.
| Methods | Design: Randomised controlled trial Duration of follow‐up: 3 months |
|
| Participants | Country: United Kingdom Urban workplace Intervention group n=55 Control group n=47 Age, gender not reported; however, they are working age adults |
|
| Interventions | Personalised travel advice Travel information pack Ongoing travel advice updates Duration of intervention: 3 months |
|
| Outcomes | Travel mode: ‐ % of trips alone by car in preceding 5 working days ‐ % of participants who travelled alone by car for all of preceding 5 working days |
|
| Notes | ||
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Adequate sequence generation? | High risk | Sequence generation method not reported |
| Allocation concealment? | High risk | Allocation concealment method not reported |
| Blinding? All outcomes | High risk | Blinding not feasible. Could have influenced outcomes |
| Incomplete outcome data addressed? All outcomes | High risk | Loss to follow‐up known to have occurred but participant flow not clearly reported |
| Free of selective reporting? | Unclear risk | Not clear that all pre‐specified outcomes were included |
| Free of other bias? | Low risk | No other sources of bias identified |
| Adequate matching of intervention / control groups? | High risk | Apparently substantial baseline differences in travel mode between intervention and control groups despite randomisation. Baseline car use was 45.5% in intervention group and 51.9% in control group. |