TAPESTRY Herts 2003.
| Methods | Design: Controlled before‐after study Duration of follow‐up: 3 weeks |
|
| Participants | Country: United Kingdom Setting: Urban primary schools in North Hertfordshire Intervention group: 11 schools, 1846 baseline responses Control group: 2 schools, 347 baseline responses Age: primary schoolchildren. Gender not reported. |
|
| Interventions | Walk to school campaign: ‐ Education packs linked to curriculum ‐ Promotional material: posters, banners etc. Duration of intervention: 1 week |
|
| Outcomes | Travel mode: proportion of children using mode at least once per week (walking, car, cycling) Effects on inequalities not reported. Adverse effects not reported. |
|
| Notes | ||
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Adequate sequence generation? | High risk | Not randomised |
| Allocation concealment? | High risk | Not randomised |
| Blinding? All outcomes | High risk | Not feasible. Could have influenced outcomes |
| Incomplete outcome data addressed? All outcomes | High risk | Approximately 52% of baseline survey responses had a matched post‐intervention survey response, so loss to follow‐up high. Could be associated with outcome |
| Free of selective reporting? | Unclear risk | Not clear that all pre‐specified outcomes were included |
| Free of other bias? | Low risk | No other sources of bias identified |
| Adequate matching of intervention / control groups? | Unclear risk | Schools appear to have self‐selected to intervention or control with no apparent attempt at matching. Baseline travel mode data relatively similar, however |