Skip to main content
. 2010 Mar 17;2010(3):CD005575. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005575.pub3

TAPESTRY Herts 2003.

Methods Design: Controlled before‐after study
Duration of follow‐up: 3 weeks
Participants Country: United Kingdom
Setting: Urban primary schools in North Hertfordshire
Intervention group: 11 schools, 1846 baseline responses
Control group: 2 schools, 347 baseline responses
Age: primary schoolchildren. Gender not reported.
Interventions Walk to school campaign:
‐ Education packs linked to curriculum
‐ Promotional material: posters, banners etc.
Duration of intervention: 1 week
Outcomes Travel mode: proportion of children using mode at least once per week (walking, car, cycling)
Effects on inequalities not reported.
Adverse effects not reported.
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Adequate sequence generation? High risk Not randomised
Allocation concealment? High risk Not randomised
Blinding? 
 All outcomes High risk Not feasible. Could have influenced outcomes
Incomplete outcome data addressed? 
 All outcomes High risk Approximately 52% of baseline survey responses had a matched post‐intervention survey response, so loss to follow‐up high. Could be associated with outcome
Free of selective reporting? Unclear risk Not clear that all pre‐specified outcomes were included
Free of other bias? Low risk No other sources of bias identified
Adequate matching of intervention / control groups? Unclear risk Schools appear to have self‐selected to intervention or control with no apparent attempt at matching. Baseline travel mode data relatively similar, however