Chang 2004.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Parallel, 24 h | |
Participants | PCA 62, control 63 (142 total agreed to participate, but initial group assignment numbers before withdrawal not described) abdominal gynecologic surgery | |
Interventions | PCA: morphine. Bolus/lockout/4 h limit: NR/8 to 10 min/NR Control: IM morphine 0.1 to 0.2 mg/kg (max 10 mg every 3 h) prn |
|
Outcomes | Pain intensity, patient satisfaction, cost‐effectiveness, opioid use, side effects | |
Source of funding | Grant from the Hong Kong Health Services Research Committee | |
Notes | Method of measurement of respiratory depression not defined QS = 3 (R = 2, DB = 0, W = 1) |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Computer‐generated |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not mentioned |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | "Double blinding was not adopted, as there were obvious differences in each method of pain management. However, the research assistant and ward staff were blind to the research hypotheses." |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Unclear how many participants withdrew in each group (17 total). Results reported for completers only |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All outcomes described in Methods section are reported in Results section |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Small sample size |