Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 2;2015(6):CD003348. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003348.pub3

Chang 2004.

Study characteristics
Methods Parallel, 24 h
Participants PCA 62, control 63 (142 total agreed to participate, but initial group assignment numbers before withdrawal not described)
abdominal gynecologic surgery
Interventions PCA: morphine. Bolus/lockout/4 h limit: NR/8 to 10 min/NR
Control: IM morphine 0.1 to 0.2 mg/kg (max 10 mg every 3 h) prn
Outcomes Pain intensity, patient satisfaction, cost‐effectiveness, opioid use, side effects
Source of funding Grant from the Hong Kong Health Services Research Committee
Notes Method of measurement of respiratory depression not defined
QS = 3 (R = 2, DB = 0, W = 1)
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Computer‐generated
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not mentioned
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes High risk "Double blinding was not adopted, as there were obvious differences in each method of pain management. However, the research assistant and ward staff were blind to the research hypotheses."
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Unclear how many participants withdrew in each group (17 total). Results reported for completers only
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All outcomes described in Methods section are reported in Results section
Other bias Unclear risk Small sample size