Murphy 1994.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Parallel, 24 h | |
Participants | PCA 100, control 100 Laparotomy, thoracotomy | |
Interventions | PCA: meperidine. Bolus/lockout/4 h limit: 20 mg/5 min/NR (titration permitted) Control: IV meperidine nurse controlled infusion, 0 to 40 mg/h with bolus doses of 20 to 40 mg and titration permitted |
|
Outcomes | Pain intensity, opioid consumption, levels of nausea and sedation, incidence of adverse events | |
Source of funding | Supported by the Dr. John Boyd Craig Bursary of the Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists | |
Notes | Respiratory depression requiring treatment with naloxone: 1/100 vs 1/100
Withdrawals: previous neurological deficit preventing use of PCA (n = 1) QS = 2 (R = 1, DB = 0, W = 1) |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not described |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not mentioned |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Not explicitly stated, but appears to be unblinded |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Only 1 withdrawal (PCA group), unrelated to intervention |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All outcomes described in Methods section are reported in Results section. |
Other bias | Low risk | Adequate sample size |