Kakuda 2013.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods |
Study design: Historically controlled trial Study grouping: Method: Participants were not on any medication; no washout required; 4‐week before‐and‐after trial |
|
Participants |
Baseline Characteristics 2 mg
Included criteria: Japanese men, who agreed to undergo pitavastatin treatment and mixed meal test, were involved in this study (n = 10;age: 33.9 ± 10.1 years; body height 172.0 ± 4.3 cm; body weight 80.2 ± 25.3 kg; body mass index (BMI) 27.0 ± 8.3kg/m2; waist circumference 88.5 ± 18.9 cm) Excluded criteria: not reported. Baseline Group Characteristics: Japanese men, (n = 10; age 33.9 ± 10.1 years; body height 172.0 ± 4.3 cm; body weight 80.2 ± 25.3 kg; body mass index (BMI) 27.0 ± 8.3 kg/m2 ; waist circumference 88.5 ± 18.9 cm). None of them had received medication. |
|
Interventions |
Intervention Characteristics 2 mg |
|
Outcomes |
Total cholesterol
LDL cholesterol
HDL cholesterol
|
|
Notes | Stephen P on 02/02/2018 08:13 Outcomes Triglyceride outcome was not included in the efficacy analysis because the values were expressed as medians. | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | High risk | Judgement Comment: Controlled before‐and‐after design |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | High risk | Judgement Comment: Controlled before‐and‐after design |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Judgement Comment: Lipid parameter measurements unlikely to be influenced by lack of blinding |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Judgement Comment: Lipid parameters were measured in a remote laboratory. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Judgement Comment: LDL‐cholesterol outcome was reported. |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Judgement Comment: source of funding was not reported. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) Total cholesterol | Low risk | All participants were included in the efficacy analysis. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) LDL cholesterol) | Low risk | All participants were included in the efficacy analysis. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) HDL cholesterol | Low risk | All participants were included in the efficacy analysis. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) Triglycerides | High risk | Triglyceride data were not included in the efficacy analysis. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)WDAEs | High risk | No comparison possible |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) for WDAEs | High risk | No WDAE outcome reported |