Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 19;2020(6):CD012735. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012735.pub2

Kakuda 2013.

Study characteristics
Methods Study design: Historically controlled trial
Study grouping:
Method: Participants were not on any medication; no washout required; 4‐week before‐and‐after trial
Participants Baseline Characteristics
2 mg
  • n: 10

  • Males (n): 10

  • Females (n): 0

  • Total cholesterol: 197.9 mg/dL (5.12 mmol/L)

  • LDL cholesterol: 121.5 mg/dL (3.14 mmol/L)

  • HDL cholesterol: 56.6 mg/dL (1.46 mmol/L)


Included criteria: Japanese men, who agreed to undergo pitavastatin treatment and mixed meal test, were involved in this study (n = 10;age: 33.9 ± 10.1 years; body height 172.0 ± 4.3 cm; body weight 80.2 ± 25.3 kg; body mass index (BMI) 27.0 ± 8.3kg/m2; waist circumference 88.5 ± 18.9 cm)
Excluded criteria: not reported.
Baseline Group Characteristics: Japanese men, (n = 10; age 33.9 ± 10.1 years; body height 172.0 ± 4.3 cm; body weight 80.2 ± 25.3 kg; body mass index (BMI) 27.0 ± 8.3 kg/m2 ; waist circumference 88.5 ± 18.9 cm). None of them had received medication.
Interventions Intervention Characteristics
2 mg
Outcomes Total cholesterol
  • Outcome type: Continuous

  • Unit of measure: Percentage change from baseline

  • Direction: Lower is better


LDL cholesterol
  • Outcome type: Continuous

  • Unit of measure: Percentage change from baseline

  • Direction: Lower is better


HDL cholesterol
  • Outcome type: Continuous

  • Unit of measure: Percentage change from baseline

  • Direction: Higher is better

Notes Stephen P on 02/02/2018 08:13
Outcomes
Triglyceride outcome was not included in the efficacy analysis because the values were expressed as medians.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) High risk Judgement Comment: Controlled before‐and‐after design
Allocation concealment (selection bias) High risk Judgement Comment: Controlled before‐and‐after design
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Low risk Judgement Comment: Lipid parameter measurements unlikely to be influenced by lack of blinding
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Low risk Judgement Comment: Lipid parameters were measured in a remote laboratory.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Judgement Comment: LDL‐cholesterol outcome was reported.
Other bias Unclear risk Judgement Comment: source of funding was not reported.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) Total cholesterol Low risk All participants were included in the efficacy analysis.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) LDL cholesterol) Low risk All participants were included in the efficacy analysis.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) HDL cholesterol Low risk All participants were included in the efficacy analysis.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) Triglycerides High risk Triglyceride data were not included in the efficacy analysis.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)WDAEs High risk No comparison possible
Selective reporting (reporting bias) for WDAEs High risk No WDAE outcome reported