Nakamura 2008.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods |
Study design: Randomised controlled trial Study grouping: Parallel group Method: No participant received lipid medications within 6 months of randomisation therefore no washout required 1 month single‐blind randomised placebo‐controlled study only the patients were blinded to the content of the tablets |
|
Participants |
Baseline Characteristics 4 mg
Placebo
Overall
Included criteria: The study enroled 65 consecutive patients with ACS, the presence of carotid plaque [intima‐media thickness (IMT) ≥ 1.1 mm], and hypercholesterolaemia (260 > total cholesterol levels ≥ 220 mg/dL). ACS was diagnosed by the presence of acute ischaemic symptoms lasting ≥ 20 minutes within 48 hours before admission to our hospital, and electrocardiographic (ECG) changes consistent with ACS. The presence of ACS was confirmed by coronary angiography in all patients. Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) was diagnosed when creatine kinase‐MB levels increased by at least 2 times the upper level of normal (3.5 ng/mL). Patients without AMI were considered to have unstable angina pectoris (u‐AP). According to these inclusion criteria, 47 patients were diagnosed as u‐AP, and 18 patients were diagnosed as AMI. Excluded criteria: (1) use of statin or other lipid‐lowering agents during the preceding 6 months, (2) history of hepatic disease, (3) untreated endocrine disorder, (4) history of systemic inflammatory diseases, (5) infectious diseases, (6) history of hypersensitivity to statins, (7) cardiogenic shock or pulmonary oedema at admission, or (8) stroke at admission Baseline Group Characteristics: 65 consecutive patients with ACS were randomised. Profiles of traditional risk factors, calibrated IBS values, and levels of CRP, VEGF, and TNFa were similar between the 2 treatment groups. All ACS patients took aspirin and ticlopidine orally during the follow‐up period, and other medications and invasive therapy for culprit lesions were similar in both treatment groups |
|
Interventions |
Intervention Characteristics 4 mg Placebo |
|
Outcomes |
Total cholesterol
LDL cholesterol
HDL cholesterol
Triglycerides
WDAE
|
|
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Judgement Comment: The ACS patients were randomly assigned using a random number table generated by a computer. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | High risk | Judgement Comment: Single‐blind allocation concealment was not applied to the investigators. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Judgement Comment: Single‐blind (only participants); however, lipid parameter measurements unlikely to be influenced by lack of blinding |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Judgement Comment: Lipid parameters were measured in a remote laboratory. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Judgement Comment: LDL‐cholesterol outcome was reported and WDAEs were reported; all of the study participants completed the trial with no WDAEs. |
Other bias | Low risk | Judgement Comment: This study was supported by Grants‐in‐Aid for (B)(2)‐15390244 and (B)‐19390209, Priority Areas (C) ‘‘Medical Genome Science 15012222’’ from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology, and by Health and Labor Sciences Research Grants for Comprehensive Research on Aging and Health (H15‐Choju‐012), Tokyo, Japan, government grants |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) Total cholesterol | Low risk | All participants were included in the efficacy analysis. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) LDL cholesterol) | Low risk | All participants were included in the efficacy analysis. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) HDL cholesterol | Low risk | All participants were included in the efficacy analysis. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) Triglycerides | Low risk | All participants were included in the efficacy analysis. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)WDAEs | High risk | Single‐blinded trial |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) for WDAEs | Low risk | WDAE outcome reported |