Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 28;10:12623. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-69369-1

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Overall study pipeline. (a) A training data-set arose in-the-clinic (DS2) and used for training of the hybrid model along with a second training set (DS1) arose from in-the-wild typing data remotely collected. (b) A hybrid model training using DS2 and DS1 produce best performing model for FMI estimation. (c) Separate data sets captured in-the-wild were used as test data for three test scenarios (T1, T2, T3); T1 correlates the estimated FMI severity with the clinical ground-truth, and the ability to classify early PD patients vs. HC in a test dataset (TS1), T2 examines the classification performance to classify de novo PD patients vs. HC in a validation set (TS2), a subset of TS1, T3 examines the classification properties of the hybrid model in a large self-reported validation set, from the union of TS1 and TS0 (TS3) against the subjects’ self-reported health status of being PD or not.