Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 28;10:12569. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-69513-x

Table 2.

Best fit parameters of ZINB models.

Model # Assay Excludea mo-contlb (95% CIg) πc (95% CIg) θd (95% CIg) Vfe (95% CIg) Vcf (95% CIg)
1 PvDMFA No 9.6 (5.2–17.7) 0.179 (0.154–0.209) 1.698 (1.547–1.864) 5.822 (3.980–8.515) 0.326 (0.189–0.560)
2 PvDMFA 1 26.8 (17.4–41.3) 0.175 (0.150–0.205) 1.735 (1.582–1.904) 2.289 (1.502–3.488) 0.144 (0.077–0.269)
3 PvDMFA 4 37.6 (25.1–56.3) 0.158 (0.134–0.185) 1.793 (1.636–1.964) 1.773 (1.139–2.760) 0.081 (0.041–0.161)
4 PfSMFA No 18.1 (16.2–20.2) 0.058 (0.053–0.063) 1.899 (1.845–1.955) 0.799 (0.666–0.957) 0.049 (0.039–0.061)
5 PfSMFA 1 18.6 (16.8–20.6) 0.058 (0.053–0.063) 1.909 (1.854–1.965) 0.676 (0.563–0.811) 0.041 (0.033–0.051)
6 PfSMFA 4 20.7 (19.0–22.7) 0.056 (0.051–0.061) 1.951 (1.896–2.009) 0.482 (0.399–0.582) 0.024 (0.018–0.032)

aExclude feeding data from model building if mean control oocyst is lower than the specified value.

bMean (arithmetic mean) oocyst in control.

cZero-inflation parameter.

dNegative binomial dispersion parameter.

eVariance of the random effects for feed.

fVariance of the random effects for COM.

g95% confidence interval.