Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 22;11:1545. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01545

TABLE 4.

Results of factorial repeated measures ANOVA of relationships of character strengths rank (highest vs. lowest character strength) and enactment type (excellent vs. typical enactment) on the ratings of the strengths expression, six core virtues, fulfillment, intellectual and moral quality, and immorality.

F p Partial η 2
Strengths Expression F(1, 185)
 Rank 28.12 <0.001 0.132
 Enactment 66.82 <0.001 0.265
 Rank × Enactment 1.71 0.192 0.009
Wisdom F(1, 188)
 Rank 10.394 0.001 0.052
 Enactment 11.03 0.001 0.055
 Rank × Enactment 0.86 0.354 0.005
Courage F(1, 188)
 Rank 5.16 0.024 0.027
 Enactment 59.74 <0.001 0.241
 Rank × Enactment 1.24 0.267 0.007
Humanity F(1, 188)
 Rank 0.69 0.408 0.004
 Enactment 12.19 0.001 0.061
 Rank × Enactment 1.49 0.224 0.008
Justice F(1, 188)
 Rank 0.11 0.744 0.001
 Enactment 2.27 0.133 0.012
 Rank × Enactment 0.94 0.335 0.005
Temperance F(1, 188)
 Rank 1.59 0.209 0.008
 Enactment 0.19 0.663 0.001
 Rank × Enactment 0.75 0.388 0.004
Transcendence F(1, 188)
 Rank 3.79 0.053 0.020
 Enactment 12.73 0.000 0.063
 Rank × Enactment 0.06 0.804 0.000
Fulfillment F(1, 208)
 Rank 17.21 <0.001 0.076
 Enactment 16.49 <0.001 0.073
 Rank × Enactment 2.54 0.113 0.012
Intellectual Quality F(1, 204)
 Rank 13.39 <0.001 0.062
 Enactment 12.20 0.001 0.056
 Rank × Enactment 4.09 0.045 0.020
Moral Quality F(1, 204)
 Rank 0.81 0.370 0.004
 Enactment 11.86 0.001 0.055
 Rank × Enactment 0.63 0.429 0.003
Immorality F(1, 204)
 Rank 3.12 0.079 0.015
 Enactment 0.69 0.408 0.003
 Rank × Enactment 0.05 0.832 0.000

N = 189–208. Rank = Whether the described enactment was based on the individual lowest (=0) or highest (=1) ranking character strength. Enactment = Whether the described enactment represented a typical (=0) or an excellent (=1) display of the character strength.