Table 4.
Percentage | Mean ± Standard Error of commands given | F-Ratio from GLM | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
E-Collar | Control 1 | Control 2 | ||
% Obey Come | 71.0 ± 3.2a | 72.4 ± 2.7a | 82.5 ± 2.3b | F(2, 114) = 4.46, P = 0.015 |
% Obey+ Come | 26.3 ± 2.8a | 24.4 ± 2.4a | 15.4 ± 2.2b | F(2, 114) = 4.33, P = 0.017 |
% Disobey Come | 2.7 ± 0.1 | 3.2 ± 0.01 | 2.1 ± 0.01 | F(2, 114) = 0.66, P = 0.52 |
% Obey Sit | 76.8 ± 2.8a | 72.7 ± 2.7a | 83.5 ± 3.2b | F(2, 114) = 3.49, P = 0.036 |
% Obey+ Sit | 18.9 ± 2.0a | 21.9 ± 2.1a | 10.6 ± 2.1b | F(2, 114) = 6.69, P = 0.002 |
% Disobey Sit | 4.4 ± 0.2 | 5.4 ± 0.2 | 3.7 ± 0.1 | F(2, 114) = 0.36, P = 0.70 |
Different subscripts (a and b) indicate where training groups differed based on Tukey pair-wise comparisons.