Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 22;7:508. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00508

Table 4.

Mean percentage of “Come” and “Sit” commands (± SE) obeyed after a single signal, obeyed after multiple signals (Obey+) or not obeyed for dogs trained with E-collars and the two control groups.

Percentage Mean ± Standard Error of commands given F-Ratio from GLM
E-Collar Control 1 Control 2
% Obey Come 71.0 ± 3.2a 72.4 ± 2.7a 82.5 ± 2.3b F(2, 114) = 4.46, P = 0.015
% Obey+ Come 26.3 ± 2.8a 24.4 ± 2.4a 15.4 ± 2.2b F(2, 114) = 4.33, P = 0.017
% Disobey Come 2.7 ± 0.1 3.2 ± 0.01 2.1 ± 0.01 F(2, 114) = 0.66, P = 0.52
% Obey Sit 76.8 ± 2.8a 72.7 ± 2.7a 83.5 ± 3.2b F(2, 114) = 3.49, P = 0.036
% Obey+ Sit 18.9 ± 2.0a 21.9 ± 2.1a 10.6 ± 2.1b F(2, 114) = 6.69, P = 0.002
% Disobey Sit 4.4 ± 0.2 5.4 ± 0.2 3.7 ± 0.1 F(2, 114) = 0.36, P = 0.70

Different subscripts (a and b) indicate where training groups differed based on Tukey pair-wise comparisons.