Table 5.
Command given | Latency to respond | GLM | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
E-Collar | Control 1 | Control 2 | ||
Come | 1.35 ± 0.11a | 1.24 ± 0.09ab | 1.13 ± 0.05b | F(2, 114)= 5.89, P = 0.04 |
Sit | 1.67 ± 0.11a | 1.81 ± 0.12a | 1.36 ± 0.11b | F(2, 101)= 12.3, P < 0.001 |
Day 1 | Day 3 | Day 5 | ||
Come | 1.26 ± 0.10 | 1.30 ± 0.08 | 1.14 ± 0.08 | F(2, 114)= 1.82, P = 0.17 |
Sit | 1.44 ± 0.10a | 1.72 ± 0.11b | 1.76 ± 0.15b | F(2, 101)= 5.61, P = 0.005 |
Different subscripts (a and b) indicate where training groups differed based on Tukey pair-wise comparisons.