Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 22;7:508. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00508

Table 5.

Mean latency to complete response in seconds from initial command (± standard deviation) for those dogs that completed come and sit responses from the E-collar and 2 Control training groups and on different days.

Command given Latency to respond GLM
E-Collar Control 1 Control 2
Come 1.35 ± 0.11a 1.24 ± 0.09ab 1.13 ± 0.05b F(2, 114)= 5.89, P = 0.04
Sit 1.67 ± 0.11a 1.81 ± 0.12a 1.36 ± 0.11b F(2, 101)= 12.3, P < 0.001
Day 1 Day 3 Day 5
Come 1.26 ± 0.10 1.30 ± 0.08 1.14 ± 0.08 F(2, 114)= 1.82, P = 0.17
Sit 1.44 ± 0.10a 1.72 ± 0.11b 1.76 ± 0.15b F(2, 101)= 5.61, P = 0.005

Different subscripts (a and b) indicate where training groups differed based on Tukey pair-wise comparisons.