Skip to main content
. 2020 May 8;2020(5):CD011898. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011898.pub2

Comparison 2. Avatar therapy versus supportive counselling.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
2.1 Mental state: 1a. Specific – positive – average endpoint score (SAPS, high = poor, skewed data) – short term 1   Other data No numeric data
2.2 Mental state: 1b. Specific – insight – average endpoint score (various scales, high = poor) – short term 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
2.2.1 Attitude to voices (BAVQ‐R) 1 124 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐8.39 [‐14.31, ‐2.47]
2.2.2 Acceptance of voice (VAAS) 1 124 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 4.73 [1.40, 8.06]
2.2.3 Power of voice (VPDS) 1 115 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐0.36 [‐0.89, 0.17]
2.2.4 Total (VAAS) 1 115 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐2.91 [‐5.71, ‐0.11]
2.3 Mental state: 1c. Specific – depression – average endpoint score (various scales, high = poor, skewed data) – short term 1   Other data No numeric data
2.3.1 CDS 1   Other data No numeric data
2.3.2 DASS‐21 total 1   Other data No numeric data
2.4 Mental state: 1d. Specific – negative – average endpoint score (SANS, high = good, skewed data) – short term 1   Other data No numeric data
2.5 Mental state: 2a. General – average endpoint score ( PSYRATS total, high = poor) – short term 1 124 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐4.74 [‐8.01, ‐1.47]
2.6 Leaving study early: 1a. For any reason – short term 1 150 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.06 [0.59, 1.89]
2.7 Leaving study early: 1b. For specific reason – short term 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
2.7.1 Not contactable 1 150 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 3.00 [0.63, 14.39]
2.7.2 Refused 1 150 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.83 [0.38, 1.81]
2.7.3 Unwell 1 150 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.67 [0.11, 3.88]
2.7.4 Attended no sessions 1 150 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.33 [0.13, 0.87]
2.7.5 Discontinued during early sessions (1‐ 6) 1 150 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.70 [0.83, 3.47]
2.8 Quality of life: average endpoint score (various scales, high = good) – short term 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
2.8.1 MANSA 1 120 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 2.69 [‐1.48, 6.86]
2.8.2 Rosenberg Self‐Esteem Scale 1 121 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.55 [‐1.55, 2.65]