Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 16;2020(7):CD001304. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001304.pub3

Griffiths 1998.

Study characteristics
Methods Randomised, triple‐blind, cross‐over study. The study was described as being triple‐blind as neither the children, their parents nor the researchers knew which intervention the children received.
Duration 6 months.
Participants 16 participants with PKU (10 males, 6 females, mean age 12.6 years). All diagnosed by neonatal period and were commenced on a low‐phenylalanine diet within 3 weeks of birth. Diet continued from diagnosis until study entry.
Interventions Continuation of the low phenylalanine diet in addition to a phenylalanine‐free amino acid supplement for 3 months followed by a low phenylalanine diet plus an amino acid supplement containing phenylalanine for 3 months, or vice versa.
Outcomes Blood phenylalanine levels measured at baseline and at the end of the first and second 3‐month period. The following neuropsychological tests were carried out at the same time points: matching familiar figures; Rey verbal learning; digits forwards; paired‐associate learning; Corsi block‐tapping; Rey‐Davis manual labyrinth; Purdue pegboard and hole‐type steadiness tester.
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Method of randomisation not given.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Usual formula and experimental product prepared and coded by pharmaceutical company. Key to the code kept by a senior member of the hospital medical staff.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
Participants Low risk Triple‐blinded, neither the children, their parents nor the researchers knew which intervention the children received. Participants continued on their usual diet but with the phenylalanine content of the diet manipulated by using additional supplements.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
Clinicians Low risk Triple‐blinded, neither the children, their parents nor the researchers knew which intervention the children received.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
Outcome assessors Low risk Triple‐blinded, neither the children, their parents nor the researchers knew which intervention the children received.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Low risk An intention‐to‐treat analysis was employed.